Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Book #33: Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen


Heyoo! How is everybody doing? I know it has been awhile since my last post, but that does not mean that I have not been reading. I have been reading, reading, reading; just not writing, writing, writing. This is partially because I have been getting into the rhythm of a new school year (not so new anymore since it is November) and been busy with planning, grading, and a hectic soccer season. Not that this is an excuse for my lack of writing. It is something that I have been chiding myself for as it was something that I wanted to make a priority. The thing is I love writing while I am doing it, but the process of actually getting prepared to write is difficult. It is like grocery shopping. I HATE going to the grocery store. I have to convince myself to go when I need fresh milk, and I have to drag myself out the door. But when I am actually at the store, I don’t mind it as much. For some reason, when I am tired and mentally and physically exhausted, I have to push myself to write. I enjoy it once I get going, but I have to convince myself to get there. I also admit that I got a wee bit distracted with other books. Lately I have been on a thriller kick, and I have been reaching for those in my times of need (by which I mean all the time because when do I not need a book?). Long story short, I apologize to the few people who read my posts for my lack of updates. Now, Northanger Abbey
Rory reading Northanger Abbey in Season 4

            Dean hands Rory a copy of Northanger Abbey that she has lent him in episode seven. Rory asks Dean if he liked the book and he responds “Well, I could tell you, but then I’d have to kill you.” Rory seems to think this implies that he likes this book and exclaims “Aha! You liked it, you liked Jane Austen. I knew you would. Lane, Dean likes Jane Austen.” I would be very impressed if Dean actually read a Jane Austen novel let alone any novel Rory suggested. I have met very view teenage boys who willingly read Jane Austen in any type of situation. But if Dean actually read Northanger Abbey, then kudos to him. I’d be happy to know of a guy who actually read my recommendations and enjoyed them. I wouldn’t hold it against them, though, if they didn’t like Jane Austen. To be honest, I am not a huge fan of her either.
        
    Many people might assume that Jane Austen might be right up my alley. It seems kind of clichéd that a twenty something woman would automatically be a fan of Austen. After all, isn’t that what Bridget Jones taught us? I like the idea of Jane Austen, and I do love the Mr. Darcy type like many others, but I can say very firmly that I do not enjoy reading Jane Austen’s writing. Even if her stories are good and she has interesting plot lines, her writing style is so formal and wordy even for that time period that it is almost burdensome to read. It took me forever to get through Pride and Prejudice in college, and I trudged through Mansfield Park this summer for the AP Literature summer reading list (that also took up a lot of my Rory Gilmore Challenge Reading time). I probably read Northanger Abbey too soon after Mansfield Park and went into it thinking “oh no, not another Austen.” (Plus, the entire time I thought “Is it a hard g? or a soft g? Is like a g in grace? Or a g in gem?” I don’t know and I am an English teacher. These are the thoughts that plague my mind.) Which, I admit, isn’t the best attitude. I can say I liked Northanger Abbey better than Mansfield Park, but not as much as I liked Pride and Prejudice.
            Basically, Northanger Abbey is about a young girl named Catherine who reads too much leading her imagination to run wild and distort her perceptions of reality. Of course, there is more going on in this story such as several love triangles, the possibility of murder, and the struggle of social status. All of Austen’s novels tend to focus on the importance of social status in nineteenth century England. It is a topic she keeps returning to and, I wonder, if this was a major point of contention in her life.
Gotta love the cheesy covers!

            Of all of Austen’s narrators, I related most to Catherine. Mainly because of her love of books. Catherine, though, took her books a bit too literally. Catherine’s story is heavily influenced by the two most popular genres of the time: gothic novels and sentimental novels. Catherine’s time at Northanger Abbey (the place, not the novel) was heavily influenced by gothic stories. Hence, Catherine’s assumption that General Tilney killed his wife. Catherine’s imagination ran amuck, and created a completely fictitious story. Northanger Abbey is also a commentary on sentimental novels where a heroine goes on a journey to find love. While not an outright love story, Catherine and Henry Tilney find their way to each other in the end. In a way, Austen is warning of the dangers of reading too much, but also succumbs to that danger herself. It is clear that Catherine’s imagination and love of stories has gotten her into some predicaments, but Catherine also follows the arc of a heroine to find her one true love. So what is Austen saying? Maybe instead of looking at extremes (books are a bad influence/books are the truth); one has to look at books and stories as a way of learning and interacting with the world. And it is as I tell my students, you can’t always take literature literally. Not everything that is written is true, but what you can take away from literature is this: do not lose hope or your imagination. Because stories are an escape, a way to express oneself, and a way to see that no matter what, you are not alone.


 Picture
- Season 4 image: https://66.media.tumblr.com/3e370554f3f5d3a795ce4054c0d40923/tumblr_mkubin9CKL1s94fv2o1_1280.jpg
- Book Cover: https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1388201718l/50398.jpg
- Book Cover 2: https://hauntedhearts.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/northanger-abbey.jpg



Monday, September 3, 2018

Bonus Books: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl and Sleeping Beauty by the Grimm Brothers


What have you been doing with your summer? To me, summer directly correlates with childhood. Running barefoot outside. Staying up late. Sleeping in until noon. Trying to save your soft serve ice cream from melting faster than you can eat it. Maybe it is because I am a teacher and I have the luxury of having my summers off. I have no husband or kids to plan around. I can simply be. This time in summer gives me time to recharge my battery and let me enjoy the simple things that I don’t usually see everyday, but maybe children do. This doesn’t mean I just sit around sucking my thumb and watching cartoons all day. You can still express your inner child as a fully functioning adult. Let loose for a little while, let your imagination flow, enjoy the spontaneity of the summertime.
Gene Wilder (original) vs. Johnny Depp (remake)
            It is fitting that the two stories I am going to focus on are ones that many of us associate with our childhoods. It is well known to every Gilmore Girls fan that one of Lorelai and Rory’s favorite movies is Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (the original, duh, not the Johnny Depp remake). In episode 7, we hear about their Willy Wonka night for the first time and their
tradition of watching with a copious amount of sweets. I have seen the original movie many times throughout my childhood. I loved it, but had to watch it sparingly because it always made me want sweets I knew I could never actually have (I wanted to drink that chocolate fountain so bad!).
            When I read Roald Dahl’s novel Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as an adult, I finally realized how dark and twisted the novel actually is. Four of the children almost DIE in the
factory, or are eliminated from the competition in Wonka’s eyes, in a manor that corresponds to their flaws. Augustus is sucked into a pipe after disobeying Wonka’s order to not drink from the chocolate river. Violet turns into a blueberry after chewing Wonka’s unfinished meal replacement chewing gum. Veruca is discarded with the “bad nuts” in the Nut Testing Room. And Mike is shrunk and transported into a television. Even though each of these children are brats and disobeyed direct request from Wonka, these punishments are quite dark for a children’s story. As a child watching it, you have enough distance from the real world to not realize how dark the story is. You just see that the bad kids are punished and the good kid is rewarded. Roald Dahl did say that when writing children’s stories, one has to exaggerate the badness in the bad characters and the goodness in the good characters. If you think about it, Charlie has no flaws and does nothing wrong without the story. He is not a very complex character, but children aren’t reading this for the intricacies of the character; they want to see larger than life situations. That is what keeps them reading. It is only when you are older that you appreciate the subtle nuances in characters.

            Both Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella were also mentioned in this episode. I already discussed my thoughts on Cinderella in a previous post. It is like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory in that it is much darker than it originally appears. The Grimm Brothers’ version of Sleeping Beauty is also dark, but not to the extent of Cinderella. As a child, I always preferred Sleeping Beauty to Cinderella. My hair was a lot blonder as a child so I always thought she was the Disney Princess that looked the most like me. So, naturally, I was Sleeping Beauty for about three Halloweens in a row. She wouldn’t be the princess I would choose to be now. Although, I am extremely jealous by her ability to sleep.
    
        The first issue I have with the original tale of Sleeping Beauty is that the entire situation could have been avoided if they just invited all the fairies to the party. The only reason Princess Aurora and her people are cursed is because her parents only had room to invite twelve out of thirteen fairies. Come on! How difficult would it have been to invite just one more?! Of course, she would find out about it. Do you really want to piss off a fairy?
            Joking aside, I know that it is no fun to be the person left out. It hurts, you are angry, and you wonder why you weren’t included. I also know what happens when someone is left out of something you are involved in. It always comes back to bite you in the butt. Maybe the moral of Sleeping Beauty is to make sure everyone is included.
            The second issue I have with all versions of Sleeping Beauty is WHY IN GOD’S NAME WOULD YOU PURPOSELY PRICK YOUR FINGER ON A NEEDLE? ARE YOU DUMB? I am sorry, but once you are past the age of five you should know better. When I was little, I always touched the prickly part of a cactus at Home Depot and would scream bloody murder. Every single time we went. I’m pretty sure I stopped doing this by the time I became a teenager. Come on, Aurora, you should know better.
            Now I know Sleeping Beauty can be a romantic story; only the kiss from your true love can break the spell. That is nice in theory, but if my true love wakes me from my slumber, I will be mad. Considering I don’t always sleep, I would be extremely displeased if someone woke me up when I didn’t have to be up (to put it lightly). I guess if I were under a sleeping spell, it would be a nice way to be woken up. In real life, though, it wouldn’t be a pretty situation.

             I always enjoy rereading books that I read as a child. I gain new insights as an adult, but I also miss the innocence I had when I read them as a child. I look at these stories in a different way. In my memories, these stories appear as one way; but now I realize that I can't experience these stories the same way anymore. It is sad in a way, but also shows the power of literature. Each time you read a book, you gain something new. The experiences you have impact how you interact with the text and that is magical. If you look at it that way, no one is ever reading the same exact book. 

Images
Gene Wilder/Johnny Depp: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjq9dyi_Z7dAhXLV98KHar2CsYQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fconsequenceofsound.net%2F2016%2F09%2Fgene-wilder-believed-tim-burtons-willy-wonka-remake-was-an-insult%2F&psig=AOvVaw3NUI0tOMQY8Xi2djASCXsQ&ust=1536069036275545
Book Cover:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-49vo_Z7dAhVqc98KHX65AZcQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.ca%2FCharlie-Chocolate-Factory-Roald-Dahl%2Fdp%2F0142410314&psig=AOvVaw06GSNNz7rrPUWuBQ_e1uBD&ust=1536069193990269
Sleeping Beauty: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiY2cSV_p7dAhWGT98KHZWmDQsQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transparentpng.com%2Fcats%2Fsleeping-beauty-2.html&psig=AOvVaw1tcmYghEltP9OkAwoooygH&ust=1536069279482385
Movie Still:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiYqvi9_p7dAhVFT98KHY7WCPoQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kidspot.com.au%2Fparenting%2Freal-life%2Fin-the-news%2Fmum-wants-sleeping-beauty-banned-as-it-has-an-inappropriate-message%2Fnews-story%2Fd658efeae1355e0fa17c979adef2e2e2&psig=AOvVaw1tcmYghEltP9OkAwoooygH&ust=1536069279482385

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

Book #32: Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes


Through my reading journey I have encountered numerous long novels (Harry Potter, War and Peace, Anna Karenina, Little Dorrit, Outlander, Game of Thrones). Many of these books exceed 1000 pages and, even to me, a born and bread book lover, this is daunting. Is it necessary for a book to be that long? I have thought a lot about this and I personally think that a book does not need to be excessively long. There is a sweet spot of a novel being just long enough without being a chore to read and just short enough that it doesn’t make you go “That’s it?” If a novel is too long, it runs to risk of being repetitive and losing its audience. Most of the time, a book can make its point and be enjoyable without exceeding 350 pages. I suppose it depends on the type of book you are reading, but that will lead me on a tangent and then I will never have the chance to talk about Don Quixote.
            Lorelai is the one to reference Don Quixote in Gilmore Girls when she learns of Rory’s first kiss with Dean (and her first kiss in general). Lorelai is scoping out Dean in the grocery story while expressing to Luke that Dean isn’t good enough for Rory. “That Lothario over there has wormed his way into my daughter’s heart and mouth and for that he must die!” Lorelai exclaims referencing a well known character from Don Quixote. Lothario is basically a player with really good hair (well, I don’t know if really good hair is part of the description but I feel like a Lothario must have really good hair so he could do some dramatic hair flips). With this reference, you can see that Don Quixote has lead to many cultural references, but how many people actually read the novel? 

           
        



 It is generally accepted that Don Quixote is the first modern novel. Because of this book, literature as we know it exists. Because of this, I was hoping that I would enjoy this book, but I really didn't. I liked it better than War and Peace, but that’s not saying much because I pretty much like anything better than War and Peace. This was definitely a case of a book being too long for my enjoyment. The character of Don Quixote annoyed me at some points just because I thought he was dumb. How do you mistake inanimate objects for people? And he was a little too obsessed with knight errantry for his own good. He was so obsessed with the idea of being chivalrous that he did not come off that way. Maybe my idea of chivalry is different from his. I am not really sure.



Is Chivalry Dead?
            Many people claim that chivalry is dead in our society. That there are no good men left. While I have sure met many dumb butts, I have also had experiences with many chivalrous men. Chivalry is just different in 2018 than it was in the 1500s. Women are not helpless in 2018 and are a lot more independent. We don’t need to be taken care of. In 2018, men aren’t the only ones that can be chivalrous. Women can be too. The Dictionary defines chivalry as “the combination of qualities expected of an ideal knight, especially courage, honor, courtesy, justice, and a readiness to help the weak.” Women can have all these things too! So if a man holds the door for you, let it happen, and next time, you can hold the door for him.

            Don Quixote was more comedic than I expected. Sometimes comedic writing is thought of as less than dramatic prose. Even though I was not a huge fan of this book, I can appreciate that the first official novel was one of a comedic tone. Throughout the book, Don Quixote was thought of as mad because he decided to leave his normal life to go on an adventure as a knight. He didn’t really have a plan and that lead to a lot of (mis)adventures.
            The most painful part of the book was towards the beginning. A priest and a barber are convinced that Don Quixote is insane and the source of this insanity is his books. Books are always to blame! They trap Don Quixote in his room and discuss the merits of each of his books. They end up burning most of his books. It was painful to read! I was like “NO NOT THE BOOKS!” even though I knew it was just a story. Imagine me reading Fahrenheit 451. I was in physical distress. My point here is: books have merit. All of them. You can read only trashy romance novels for all I care and I will vouch for there merit (I read them too). Read what you want even if it isn’t the cool book of the season.
             
Photos
Gilmore Girls scene: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiY3tXP7KncAhXHm-AKHZsKDC8QjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinterest.co.uk%2Fpin%2F85146249174818165%2F&psig=AOvVaw28aFV-kwioOguzN_ovDHKq&ust=1532044479526564Book Cover: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj83fzj66ncAhWkVt8KHderBKgQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.harpercollins.com%2F9780060188702%2Fdon-quixote&psig=AOvVaw1ykyyGuwVu-9DKTV3ULOHv&ust=1532044262341109Crossed Paths:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwibo6G166ncAhXHm-AKHZsKDC8QjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcondenaststore.com%2Ffeatured%2Fcrossed-pathstoulouse-lautrec-meets-don-quixote-ronald-searle.html&psig=AOvVaw3Y2zSa6QeSGTMCIX4RgeKt&ust=1532044152133262

Friday, June 22, 2018

Book #31: The Crucible by Arthur Miller

Who isn’t intrigued by the idea of witches, secret love affairs, secrets, and lies? Well, maybe not in real life, but they sure are entertaining to watch. The Crucible by Arthur Miller is a play depicting the events of the Salem Witch Trials during the late 1600s. The play was originally a flop when it first premiered, but later became one of Miller’s most well known plays. I first read The Crucible when I was in 10th grade; it was part of our American literature curriculum. I remember enjoying the play as a student and was extra enthralled in English class while we read it. Not that I wasn’t extra enthralled the rest of the time.


Why is He So Dirty?: Teaching The Crucible in the Modern Age
            This year, I taught The Crucible to my one class of juniors. I was so excited to teach this play! I had so many ideas of what I wanted to do with it and what I wanted to discuss with my students. Did my students share in my excitement? Absolutely not. This is how it went down:

            Me: Guys, we are going to start reading The Crucible today! It’s about the Salem              Witch Trials! There are witches and drama and people burning at the stake! Isn’t               that exciting?!
             Student 1 slams head down on desk and groans loudly.
             Student 2 stares at me with a “you are crazy” look smacking her gum loudly.
             Student 3 falls asleep sitting up, drool dripping down their face.
 
Thank God for Student 4 who is nodding vigorously and cautiously smiling at me. It is clear that he is only smiling and nodding to make me feel better. The moral of the story here is that it is difficult to get 16 year olds to be excited about literature at 7:30 am. I tried, though.

            With this particular group of students, there was no way they would even read the play if we did not read it aloud. This did not proceed like I imagined it. There were several problems:
            

1. The students would forget which character they were or zone out when it was their turn to read. So whenever it was someone’s turn to read, they prefaced each line with “Oh shit.” Every. Single. Time. I kept yelling “THAT IS NOT IN THE SKRIPT! DO NOT SAY THAT!” Did they ever stop? No.

2. Some students love to be the center of attention and decide that they will read aloud every character that starts with the letter P. If you are familiar with The Crucible, you know that is a decent amount of characters (Parris, Proctor, Putnam). Whenever another student volunteers to read or accidentally read a P role, they will shout “No ‘expletive’ that’s my role!” At least they are excited about something…

3. Sometimes the students realize that the text is actually interesting. However, their reactions while reading are not always appropriate. Exhibit A: "So it’s saying that Abigail was sleeping with Proctor and his is, like, 30?! That’s so gross! He is so old! This b*!&% is cray!”

Image result for the crucible
Look's so dirty, am I right?
As you can see, teaching the play was not what I was expecting with this group of students. I was very entertained while reading this with them. While they are not always the most studious group of teenagers, they did actually begin to enjoy the text about halfway through it. They also liked watching the movie. That’s probably why they put up with reading the book. However, watching the movie presented all sorts of other issues. The students just could not get over why John Proctor looked so dirty. At least three times a day, they commented: “Why won’t he just take a shower?” It didn’t matter that I told them that the play took place in the 1600s and they didn’t have running water back then. They still could not get over that he looked dirty. That was their main take away from The Crucible.

The Witch Hunt
The Crucible was originally written as an allegory for the Red Scare in the 1950s, referring to the McCarthy trials which was a hunt to find communists hiding in plain site. Arthur Miller was called to the stand during these trials and asked to name people he thought were communists. Miller refused to do so despite what it might do to his reputation. This mirrors Proctor’s predicament in The Crucible. His wife is first accused of being a witch and when Proctor begins to ask questions about the accuser, he is then accused. The only way for Proctor to not be hanged as a witch is to admit to being a witch even though it would be a lie. His only options are to lie and say he is a witch so he can live or to tell the truth and die. Is it better to survive or to die morally? It’s a tough question. Human being are born with the instinct for survival yet we have a moral compass. What happens when these two things are at odds?
            This idea of a witch hunt is applicable to many situations. My students could relate to this because they all deal with rumors and gossips. It is so easy for someone to say something that is untrue and for that rumor to spread and transform over time. False accusations are very common when it is a he said/she said type situation. I can not tell you how many times my juniors would randomly should out "THIS IS HOW LIKE THAT ONE TIME MY EX..." My response was always "I DON'T WANT TO KNOW!" because, trust me, sometimes we are just better off not knowing what they do in their free time. 


In your face, Abigail!

Other Thoughts
- Lorelai mentions The Crucible (probably the movie version) to Luke when she says “Not gonna talk about how good you’d look dressed as one of the guys from The Crucible.” She obviously doesn’t have the same problem as my students.
- Liam Neeson played John Proctor in the 2002 Broadway revival of the play and we all know how we feel about Liam Neeson. I would watch that man in anything.
- I didn’t talk much about Abigail and the girls in this post, but I just have to say that this play shows how teenage girls can be the worst. I have been one. I deal with them everyday. I know. Sometimes they can be the sweetest, but also they can be very scary. The Crucible shows this first hand.

Pictures
- Book Cover: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiX7_HRhujbAhVPzlkKHUEACV0QjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.goodreads.com%2Fbook%2Fshow%2F17250.The_Crucible&psig=AOvVaw3InrROTXmMiEUEdfWU7rdS&ust=1529783712041474
- Proctor: http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/0df639c8d68299560f3d2ce9e90b0556.jpg- Meme:http://imoviequotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/1-the-crucible-quotes.gif